Commission says elected officials can't gamble

SPRINGFIELD, Mass (WWLP) - If a casino comes to Springfield, Springfield’s elected public officials, including the mayor, will have to keep away from the gaming tables even if their friends and family want to go gamble.

The State Gaming Commission has imposed a new regulation that bans elected officials from gambling at a casino in their community.

Gaming Commission Chair Stephen Crosby said he supports this new regulation because of public image issues. He's wondering what people would think of their elected officials, if officials are seen gambling and drinking at a casino.

But some western Massachusetts residents don't think their perception of city councilors or board members will change even if they run into those officials at a casino.

Tom Foley of West Springfield told 22News “Then after the fact, two years after it's built, they don't work there. The fact that they voted on approving a casino in your community... That's their job.”

Springfield City Councilors said they understand most regulations.

Councilor Tim Allen said “I've certainly heard of the possibility of the elected officials who vote on this not ending up with jobs at the casino. I understand the theory behind that.”

But with this "No Gambling" rule, they aren't sure if they can get on board right away.

Allen said “Guess I'd have to hear more about the rationale on that one.”

Councilor Bud Williams said “I mean, what is it? Is there some precedent here? I'm just willing to listen, but I think instead of making a broad statement, they should come out at clarify exactly what they mean.”

Commission Chair Stephen Crosby said the main concern was that elected officials would not be able to deal with casino issues fairly if they gambled or received complementary services.