casino-opponents

A demonstration by Springfield casino opponents earlier this year

Large Map
  • Related Stories
Table games to begin at Twin River Casino
Table games to begin at Twin River

Bettors will soon be able to play blackjack, roulette and craps…

Gaming Commission presents Phase Two application
Gaming Commission presents application

The State Gaming Commission presented the final application …

Chicopee casino not going to happen, Rep. Wagner says
Wagner: Chicopee casino won't happen

State Rep. Joseph Wagner says that a Chicopee casino will not …

Anti-Casino group holds out hope
Anti-Casino group holds out hope

In a little more than one month, Springfield voters will decide…

Hard Rock discusses plans with the community
Hard Rock talks with the community

West Springfield residents still have a long list of questions …

Advertisement

Group formed to fight possible Springfield casino

Citizens Against Casino Gaming founded

Updated: Friday, 14 Sep 2012, 5:03 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 14 Sep 2012, 4:59 PM EDT

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) - Opponents to a proposed casino in Springfield have organized a committee to bring their cause to the people of the city.

Springfield Attorney Michael Kogut announced Friday that he has filed paperwork establishing the committee, which is known as Citizens Against Casino Gaming. The committee, which will be able to accept unlimited contributions from individuals and corporations, is intended to persuade residents to reject a proposed casino in the city. At least four developers have expressed an interest in building in Springfield.

Under the state’s gaming law, residents of communities where casinos are proposed must vote to approve a casino plan before it can get final approval from the Gaming Commission. Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno has indicated that he wants to bring one or more casino proposals before city voters by spring of 2013.

In the mean time, Kogut says that his group will work to provide information and “fact-check the one-sided casino public relations campaign.”

“While no match for the out-of-state financial resources of the powerful casino lobby, Springfield residents will now have an avenue and forum to express their opposition to a casino in Springfield if and when a ballot question is placed before the voters,” Kogut said.

The group favors holding a city-wide vote, rather than a vote solely in the ward in which the proposed casino is located. Under the state law, larger communities such as Boston and Springfield can have ward-only votes, while smaller communities must have town-wide votes. It is unclear at this time whether Springfield’s vote will be city-wide or ward-specific, though the City Council is expected to decide in the next few weeks.

Casino proponents argue that building a casino in the city would provide thousands of jobs and increases in tax revenue, while opponents say that casinos bring increased crime and disproportionately harm low-income residents.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement